<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>Property or People?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/" />
<modified>2004-12-10T00:17:06Z</modified>
<tagline>A look at the intent of security implementations around campus</tagline>
<id>tag:www.hyfidelic.com,2004:/jus494/10</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.121">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2004, 494</copyright>
<entry>
<title>Manzanita Hall</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/manzanita_hall.html" />
<modified>2004-12-10T00:17:06Z</modified>
<issued>2004-12-08T04:32:22Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.hyfidelic.com,2004:/jus494/10.295</id>
<created>2004-12-08T04:32:22Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
<author>
<name>494</name>

<email>494@hyfidelic.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Buildings</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/">
<![CDATA[<p><img alt="manzh.jpg" src="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/manzh.jpg" width="350" height="259" /></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>     Arizona State University has one of the highest student body totals in the entire country.  Every year the freshman class has more students then the pervious year.  These students for the most part are leaving their homes and moving away for the first time to one of the fourteen resident halls on campus.  As students arrive in their resident halls they become excited to be out on their own and meet new people.  The last thing on their minds is safety or lack thereof.  <br />
     The new residents are met at the door with smiling faces by their new resident hall assistants or RA.  The purpose of a resident assistant is to play a vital role in developing and maintaining the atmosphere of academic, personal and social growth.  Under a list of their responsibility is to conduct night/weekend duty rotations to assist with the safety and security of buildings.  It is interesting that crime reports have shown that with an increase in students every year leads to an increase in crime.  Every year since 1994 car theft, property damage, and bike theft have increased on ASU campus.  To curb this trend thousand of dollars have been given to Arizona State University’s police or DPS.  They have placed surveillance cameras in the Memorial Union, parking garages, and in all buildings excluding residence halls with the exception of one, Manzanita Hall.  <br />
     Manzanita Hall is a freshmen year experience hall meaning only freshmen live their and is the largest resident hall on campus.  After talking to Bryan Custer, a former Resident Assistant for 3 years and currently works in the resident life department, was informed that Manzanita Hall is the only hall with surveillance cameras.  There is one camera in the lobby that watches the entrance to the hall and the second camera is on the roof of this 15 story building.  The camera in the lobby is a small camera which is stationed to always face the entrance.  The camera on the roof is much larger and can be moved in a complete circle and appears to be looking out over the campus.  <br />
     I visited Manzanita Hall to have a few of my questions answered on their surveillance cameras.  I was hoping to learn why Manzanita Hall is the only hall on campus with a surveillance camera?  Who has access to the cameras monitor screens and whether or not the video feed is being recorded or just observed?  Who is in charge of the cameras, especially the camera on the roof?  What is the purpose of the surveillance cameras?  Was it to watch students or property?  Last, what are each cameras capabilities?  I would especially like to know about the camera on its roof and how far it can zoom in and out?  <br />
     To find the answers to my questions I first visited the front desk of the hall and asked the young lady working at the desk if I could talk to somebody about their surveillance cameras for a class project.  The desk assistant then wrote down two names and numbers to call and then assured me that they would have the answers to my questions.  The first was the Resident Hall Coordinator Geoffrey Stark and then Hall Director Michael Pule.  I first called Geoffrey but I his answer machine only answered so I left my name, purpose, and a phone number to reach me at.  I am still waiting for a return phone call.  Then I called Michael who answered his phone but stated he didn’t know the answers to my questions.  He then gave me another name and number to call and I was again assured that this person would be able to answer all my questions.  I was given the name Ruth Kinsley but not her job title.  I searched the school directory and home page and was unsuccessful at finding anything about her.  Ruth did answer her phone but after a short conversation she quickly told me didn’t have any information on the cameras and that I could give her the questions I needed answered and she would contact me by December 7th.  I read out my questions over the phone to her and thanked her for her help.  As of today December 8th I have still not received a phone call from Ruth or Geoffrey.  My questions still remain unanswered.  This leaves me to draw my own conclusions from my observations.<br />
     My first goal is try to figure out why is Manzanita Hall the only resident hall on campus that has a surveillance camera in the lobby.  It would seem that all resident halls would have a camera in its lobby, not just one.  I went back to the lobby of the hall to look around and try to determine if the camera is protecting students or property.  Inside the lobby are a small computer lab, a flat screen television monitor, and a couple of offices.  I first thought perhaps the camera was for preventing vandalism to the monitor or stealing of computers.  However, I next went into the dorm next door to Manzanita called Palo Verde East.  This hall had the same flat screen monitor and computer lab.  I now believe that the camera’s purpose is to monitor the entrance to the hall and therefore aiding student safety along with RA’s.  I do believe that the camera’s video feed is being recorded but is erased probably at the end of the week.  The camera on the roof is the mystery.  During my first visit to the hall it was looking out toward the football stadium.  My next visit had the camera looking out over University Street.  With these camera placed on the roof it could possible look out over most of the campus and therefore I believe that DPS not the resident halls are controlling it.  Its purpose seems to be to protect property such as buildings and the stadium then student safety.  I would assume it has the capabilities to seem in, possible close enough to read what somebody walking on University Street has on their hat.<br />
     Manzanita hall was a reputation as being the worse hall on campus.  Worse in that crime is the highest and vandalism in elevators and on each floor is frequent.  There have even been reports of sexual harassment cases taking place inside the hall by students and strangers.  It is strange that the only hall with a surveillance camera in their lobby is worse off then the other 13 halls that rely solely on RA’s patrolling the halls.  The surveillance camera seems to be an extra expense that hasn’t produced desired results of student safety.  Last the camera on the roof was a bit unsettling after I first noticed it.  I always figured that inside building or parking structures that I would be under surveillance but I didn’t know that just by walking down University Street I would be watched.  There are no signs around Manzanita or University Street that states you are under surveillance.  It wasn’t until my 4th year here at Arizona State University that I realized a camera sat on top of this hall.  Perhaps it will take another 4 years to get the answers to my questions and learn the cameras purpose.     </p>

<p>Contact Numbers:<br />
Michael Pule: 480-965-0323<br />
Geoffrey Stark: 480-965-5537<br />
Ruth Kinsley: 480-727-6948</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Business Building</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/business_building.html" />
<modified>2004-12-10T00:17:06Z</modified>
<issued>2004-12-08T01:42:48Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.hyfidelic.com,2004:/jus494/10.292</id>
<created>2004-12-08T01:42:48Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
<author>
<name>494</name>

<email>494@hyfidelic.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Buildings</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/">
<![CDATA[<p><img alt="Business.jpg" src="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/Business.jpg" width="441" height="283" /></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>     Starting this research I began with the assumption that the decision to put any type of surveillance equipment in a building would be based solely on protecting the schools financial assets. This, based on the research done in and around the Business building, proved true. The first camera that I noticed on the Business building is the one located in the outside stairwell leading down to the basement of the building where the computer commons are located. This camera looks old and I'd bet that it was not functional but it does look down the stair well at the entrance to the basement of the building. Probably watching people leaving the building. Based on the surrounding environment I have come to the conclusion that this camera is located where it is to record anybody trying to leave the building with school property.<br />
	The rest of the cameras inside the building seem to have the same function, recording property crime. Pointing in a direction that poorly defines public safety these cameras do a poor job to instill any feelings of safety.  Many of the cameras are pointed towards the entrances recording the routes the average criminal would try to escape with a monitor under his arm. The cameras may be there to deter crime but since I could not find evidence of anyone watching them or the ability for the cameras to move automatically to watch a large area I can not see how they will do much to record violent crime. The cameras are in plain sight and can be easily avoided.  The building is older than some of the other more “watched” buildings but that does not mean students can not be harmed here. <br />
	As I do this research I can not help but think of the armed guard who was murdered recently out front of the AMC in Awatukee. While the guard was being gunned down his (armed) partner sat in the truck and did nothing. The problem with this is that he did exactly what he had been trained to do. The money is more important than life and this situation has shown this in a terrible way. This says something about our society we live in and how we react to this society. This guard would rather his partner die than chance losing his own job, how selfish. I cannot help but see a correlation between this type of event and the placement of the so called security cameras placed around a campus where over 50,000 young adults spend a large amount of their young lives. The administration may say that the cameras are there for “our” safety but their actual locations and placement around campus and in the Business building show something different. Property has become more important than people…</p>

<p>If you would like more information about who, what, when, where, why, and how ASU places and regulates it use of surveilance cameras you can look for its official policy here: <a href="http://www.asu.edu/aad/manuals/dps/dps201-06.html"><img alt="asu.jpg" src="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/asu.jpg" width="54" height="23" /></a></p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Computer Commons</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/computer_commons.html" />
<modified>2004-12-10T00:17:06Z</modified>
<issued>2004-12-08T00:58:48Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.hyfidelic.com,2004:/jus494/10.291</id>
<created>2004-12-08T00:58:48Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
<author>
<name>494</name>

<email>494@hyfidelic.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Buildings</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/">
<![CDATA[<p><img alt="Computercommons.bmp" src="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/Computercommons.bmp" width="350" height="245" /><br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p><strong><br />
Overview</strong></p>

<p>The computer commons is a building on campus that houses over 225 computers available for students and faculty to use free of charge.  Granted, there may be computers inside the computer commons that were given to ASU as gifts, or are just being leased to ASU from Macintosh or Microsoft, but either way, 225 computers equals a lot of money,</p>

<p>Therefore, when we started doing some research for this project, my initial hypothesis for this building was that there was going to be a good number of cameras, some outside, more inside.  I wasn’t sure what to expect when considering what directions the cameras may be pointed, but I thought that the entrances would be covered and I also expected some cameras inside the main atrium where most of the workstations are located.  I also hypothesized that most of the cameras would be primarily used to protect property at the computer commons, not people.</p>

<p>This hypothesis, however, I began to second guess because I know classes are taught inside the commons which, as seen in the other buildings around campus, buildings which classes are taught in have proven to be a hotbed for surveillance.</p>

<p>So, before even stepping foot inside the computer commons, I was ready to see some kind of surveillance outside the building, cameras watching the entrances and exits of the building, and cameras inside the building either monitoring the students using the workstations or the classrooms within the commons.</p>

<p> <br />
<strong>Findings</strong></p>

<p>Camera #1</p>

<p>When I was walking up to the computer commons on my mission to scout the locations of the security cameras in and outside the building, I noticed I looked at the building very differently.  I began studying the building and everything around it like I have never done before in 4 years at Arizona State.  </p>

<p>Much to my dismay, I didn’t see anything.  No cameras outside the building watching me, no cameras on the light poles the line the pseudo street in front of the computer commons.  I did a walk around the building. (The 3 sides of the building, it’s connected to the bookstore which I didn’t go into)  I was shocked, not one camera spying on me!  What? Was I not special enough to be watched by the computer geeks inside the computer commons?  Well, I swallowed my pride and walked into the building to find out.</p>

<p>As soon as I walked into the computer commons (the main entrance) I saw the first camera.  It was mounted on the wall inside the building and was pointing towards the inside of the atrium.  </p>

<p>It wasn’t easy to find this camera, I had to turn around to see it, and it soon became apparent to me that this camera’s purpose was to watch people leaving the computer commons.  Even though the camera probably had the capability to zoom into the middle of the atrium, I believe whomever was watching this security camera was watching people leave, not watching them work.  The operator was probably looking for anybody leaving with a monitor, computer printer, scanner, something along those lines.  I found it hard to believe that a camera mounted on the wall pointing in was protecting students working at least 50 feet away from it, so I concluded that this camera’s purpose was most likely to protect property.</p>

<p>Camera #2 and #3</p>

<p>It wasn’t easy finding the second camera.  I found it located outside the building, but attached to the part of the building that overhangs one of the side exits.  This camera was also pointed inward, as to monitor the people leaving the building.  There is no way this camera could see anybody inside the building because it was angled such that the entire doorway was in focus, nothing beyond that.  It was only logical that this camera served the same purpose as the first camera, protection of property and watching people leave the building.</p>

<p>The third and last camera I found at the computer commons was also on a side exit, again angled down to focus the doors and pointed inward to watch people leave.  It was nearly identical to the second camera. </p>

<p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p>

<p><br />
Camera #1</p>

<p>Location: Main Entrance<br />
Aimed: Inward towards atrium<br />
Purpose: Protection of property<br />
Notes: Has ability to focus on main atrium, but obviously not its main purpose</p>

<p>Camera #2</p>

<p>Location: Outside, West doors, South Side Exit<br />
Aimed: Inward towards doors<br />
Purpose: Protection of property<br />
Notes: Impossible to be used to protect people, doesn’t have the ability to see inside 	building.</p>

<p>Camera #3</p>

<p>Location: Outside, West doors, North Side Exit<br />
Aimed: Inward towards doors<br />
Purpose: Protection of Property<br />
Notes: Almost identical to camera #2, impossible to be used to protect people, doesn’t 	have the ability to see inside building.</p>

<p>It is my conclusion that the computer commons use of surveillance cameras is only used to protect ASU’s property.  It is not surprising to discover this considering the computer commons houses over 225 computers.  I was surprised to find zero cameras inside the computer commons that monitored the people using the workstations.  I was also surprised to find zero camera’s outside the building overlooking the street or palm walk, however no research was done outside the immediate computer commons area.<br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lot 16</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/lot_16.html" />
<modified>2004-12-10T00:17:06Z</modified>
<issued>2004-12-07T01:55:02Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.hyfidelic.com,2004:/jus494/10.296</id>
<created>2004-12-07T01:55:02Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
<author>
<name>494</name>

<email>494@hyfidelic.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Parking</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/">
<![CDATA[<p><img alt="lot16.jpg" src="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/lot16.jpg" width="335" height="445" /><br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>Lot 16 is located on the Northwest corner of campus at University and Mill.  It is generally allocated for use by Parking and Transit Services primarily for faculty and staff that work in buildings around that section of campus which include (but are not limited to): Coor Hall, Stauffer, and Architecture & Environmental Studies.  The cost per decal is $225 – the same as a parking structure.  While some students do have decals for this lot, a majority of those who use this lot heavily during cross park times in the evening (4-7pm) by those who take night classes.  This lot also serves as a public lot 12 hours each weekday (7pm-7am) and on the weekends.</p>

<p>This lot, in particular, is located in a rather busy area of Tempe in terms of both vehicular and foot traffic.  Additionally, a lot of transients in the area frequent this section of Tempe both day and night.  Both of these factors would give cause for concern with regard to the safety of those who park in this area, especially after dark.  However, in actuality it appears as though no real efforts have been taken to provide a sense of security or safety.  There are not even "blue light" emergency phones in place within reasonable proximity to the area.</p>

<p>Within the past month, there was an instance where an attempted theft of a student's vehicle from the lot in the middle of the day occurred.  Police were called to respond to the crime-in-progress by not surveillance, but by a fellow student who had noticed an individual breaking the window to a car.  Without that intervention, the thief would have had the ability to either successfully steal the vehicle or to leave unnoticed and unreported.</p>

<p>There are no visible deterrents to theft or crime in the area, the lot has varied usage and use regulation that ranges from restricted to decal-holders to open/public, and there are a total of four different entrances from three different streets to this lot in addition to a bus stop.  While the lot is relatively well lit at nighttime, this does not change the overall lack of security for this lot.  Lot 16 fails in meeting any reasonable expections of safety and security.</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lot 59</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/lot_59.html" />
<modified>2004-12-10T00:17:06Z</modified>
<issued>2004-12-07T00:42:06Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.hyfidelic.com,2004:/jus494/10.294</id>
<created>2004-12-07T00:42:06Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
<author>
<name>494</name>

<email>494@hyfidelic.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Parking</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/">
<![CDATA[<p><img alt="a2.jpg" src="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/a2.jpg" width="685" height="487" /><br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>Lot 59 is the largest of all the parking lots at ASU.  This lot has 6,171 parking spaces in and it also has a structure parking area to.  This parking lot is also the furthest lot from the center of the university.  This lot also contains Frank Kush Stadium, Well Fargo Arena, the baseball field, and it also contains the track and field stadium.  With all the activities that could be going on in this area you would think that they would have a pretty decent amount of cameras out there.  Between school functions and just school class going on there could be people and cars in these parking lot almost all day long.</p>

<p>When I first started doing this project I thought that most of the cameras would be focused around all the sporting facilities.  I thought that ASU would be more worried about their facilities and not so worried about the people and the people’s belongings.  I thought that the angles the cameras would be looking are in the direction of the stadiums and not really looking at the parking lot itself.</p>

<p>I asked a few people a simple question.  What do you think the functions of the cameras are in lot 59?  I received a wide range of answers.  Most of the people that I asked didn’t even know that there were cameras in or around the lot.  They thought that they just had the blue light call system.  One of the people that I asked said that the cameras were there to make us feel save and that they weren’t even working.  A couple of the people said that these cameras were in place to watch over the parking lot and make sure that nothing happens.  It is weird because the reason that I thought the camera was there was because of the sporting facilities and not one person said that when I asked them the question.  This is why I wanted to get the opinion of some of my fellow students because they have different opinions about things and I wanted to see what they were.</p>

<p>The findings were quiet interesting in the fact that there weren’t as many cameras as I thought there was going to be.  I counted a total of 13 cameras in the area.  This included 3 that were on top of the North side of the football field, 6 total that were on Packard Drive 3 on each side of the road, 4 that were on the football field side of Rio Saldo, and 3 total in the lot that is nest to the Tempe Town Lake.  I found this to be odd that they only have 3 in the biggest of all the lots of 59 and the lot that is furthest from the campus.  It looked like the types of cameras that were being used were one that could move.  These cameras were placed on the entrance/exit in the parking lot on the street.  So it looks to me that these cameras are looking over the parking lot and not the sporting facilities.  So this would prove my hypothesis wrong.  It looks to me that these cameras are in deed set up for the safety of the students and not for ASU property.  This would be different then others in my group because for the most part they came to the conclusion that the cameras they looked at were for the protection of the property and not for the safety of the students.   <br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Structure 3</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/structure_3.html" />
<modified>2004-12-10T00:17:06Z</modified>
<issued>2004-12-06T23:56:08Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.hyfidelic.com,2004:/jus494/10.299</id>
<created>2004-12-06T23:56:08Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
<author>
<name>494</name>

<email>494@hyfidelic.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Parking</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/">
<![CDATA[<p><img alt="structure3.jpg" src="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/structure3.jpg" width="382" height="445" /><br />
</p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>Structure 3 is located adjacent to Stauffer and Coor Hall.  Coor Hall is one of the most heavily monitored locations on campus with concern to surveillance cameras.  Many individuals who work at both of those buildings park in Structure 3 along with many students who are residents at the nearby McClintock Hall.</p>

<p>There are no surveillance cameras on any of the 5 floors of this structure.  There are a total of 13 “blue light” emergency phones located near staircases and elevator access on the various floors of the building.  Outside of this feature there are no additional safety or crime prevention apparatus employed.</p>

<p>While the location of this structure is somewhat on the interior of the Northwest corner of campus (insulated by surrounding buildings and a low-traffic side street), it also provides an environment where if a crime were to occur – catching a perpetrator would be difficult.<br />
</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Property or people?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/archives/property_or_people.html" />
<modified>2004-12-10T00:17:06Z</modified>
<issued>2004-12-05T23:44:40Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.hyfidelic.com,2004:/jus494/10.298</id>
<created>2004-12-05T23:44:40Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">In this project our group set out to take a look at surveillance on the main campus of Arizona State University with concern to what value or purpose that coverage may have. After looking at various buildings and parking lots/structures...</summary>
<author>
<name>494</name>

<email>494@hyfidelic.com</email>
</author>
<dc:subject>Introduction</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyfidelic.com/jus494/">
<![CDATA[<p>In this project our group set out to take a look at surveillance on the main campus of Arizona State University with concern to what value or purpose that coverage may have.  After looking at various buildings and parking lots/structures around campus, we found overwhelmingly that any active surveillance was arranged in such a way as to clearly serve as protective measure for property and not to enhance the safety of students, faculty, staff, or visitors to the ASU campus.  Additionally, in areas heavily frequented by people throughout the day and where crimes of opportunity are prone to occur - there was little to no surveillance or deterrents.</p>

<p>Below are articles detailing our observations and findings regarding the sampling of locations we considered in this project.</p>

<p>Thanks for visiting!</p>

<p>-</p>

<p>Contributions to this project were made by the following individuals:</p>

<p>Jon Hutcheson<br />
Patrick Newton<br />
Tom Rogers<br />
Troy Sickels<br />
Joe Waller</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>